CSCE 624 Sketch Rec Blog Comments by
Anurag Garg (P) - 323007195
- After working on some of the code, I completely agree with you on Messy Code thing..!!
- I think - it all depends upon the kind of application we are trying to apply any feature to. Something that works for one domain may not work for other. So, "one size fits all" doesn't really hold true here
http://ankurgupta-624-sketch.blogspot.com/2014/11/using-entropy-to-distinguish-shape-vs.html?showComment=1418883710313
- It would be nice to find a solution that is of Polynomial Order. It would be a great improvement over the worst case scenario (Exponential).
- I probably feel that Entropy is kind of feature that might work really well for some domains and might just not perform for others. Its probably because this feature is very specific.
- I agree with you on your research ideas. I am not sure but I think - they can also be used in domains that require strategy planning like - Soccer, Hockey or may be Military purposes.
- I second you on trying this with devices like Google Glass. I strongly feel that with Human Wearable Computing gaining relevance day-by-day, it can prove to be an interesting experiment.
- Since its easy to code, fast and requires only a single template, this can be easily plugged into any HCI app..!!
- That's few valid questions that you have raised. I also feel these kinds of thing also depend a lot on what kind of mood person is in and this might have impact on the expected results
- One of the other reasons could be - Since it was published way back in 1991, not many ML algorithms could have been in heavy use or explored up to an extent to be tried !! Linear Regression would have been among the well known algos..
- These are some useful conclusions that you have drawn from the brushing exercise. Never really thought that brushing can be that random. Just a thought - not sure if this is in the right direction
- we know the length of the brushing pattern along the x-axis in both the directions/orientations would almost be similar. Can't we use this factor to align all the brushing patterns..
- Agree with you on your conclusion. The algorithm for ShortStraw matches more with our intuitions rather than complex Mathematical equations.
http://jcherian42.blogspot.com/2014/10/paper-10-shortstraw-simple-and.html?showComment=1418887993717
- Agree with you on your Have and Haven'ts. Sketch Rec system should not also be aggressive in giving feedback as this may distract the users and affect their normal sketching skills.
- I agree with your point on system without complex domain restrictions. Users always run away from system with steep learning curve.
- If you look at the timings, bulk of them is taken by SBFS. Almost 60-70%. SBFS is a greedy algorithm. So, it doesn't yield the optimal solution as well. Biggest improvement can be made if we can find a replacement for that or find a way to optimize it. A trained classifier approach can be one such solution.
- I agree with you on Polar Co-ordinate transformations. It really speeds-up the whole algorithm.
- An interesting view of Fitt's Law. The figure explains it all. Extending Fitt's law into space where movement takes place in 3D would be one interesting thing to look at.
- I agree with you on that. I was also unsure about how effective the system can be until I watched few videos related to that.Few more videos can be found here:
- Good explanation on how it helps in recognizing Interspersing Sketches faster.
- Great Presentation. You covered all the important aspects of the paper particularly how Indexing Algo works and helps in speed-up.
- I think - beautification has its use cases only in very specific domains. I completely agree with Raniero and Josh's idea of using it sparingly and only when its needed.